Trying to understand and be able to explain the most common phenomena needs a hard mind-work. In order to do so, De Landa appeal to the term Machinic-phylum. Coined by Gilles Deleuze and Félix Guattari, a hybrid-term that describes something between a machine and living being.
For the last decades, an extreme confidence in the “purity” of things has been the vector for design. The belief in a kind of moral integrity inside the object of design, and of course in the understanding of the whole reality, has been the path for many interventions and essays about the reality, translated in Urban proposals, Manifestos, Political plans, etc. This kind of approach forgets —in a way— the wrapped condition of contradiction that reality is. Is well known for the metal artisans, that the alloy is the best way to make a soft metal stronger and at the same time give flexibility to a non-flexible metal. These two properties breed a new metal. A metal with an improvement in the properties of the raw metals is more valuable in terms of its machinery for the manufacture of tools and weapons. It’s more about a state of “a-kind-of-impurity” in the alloy which gives in back a more reach-metal than the predecessors. “The point here is that a key ingredient for combinatorial richness, and hence, for an essentially open future, is heterogeneity of components.”—machinic phylum on the Web by De Landa—
Bringing up this machinery-system, embedded inside many natural behaviors, clear in
That is not an organic behavior, is a very healthy-approach to decode the apparent chaotic systems, which in fact are no more than a combinatorial-richness. Sometimes the effect of this combinatory may be a very destructive phenomenon like the storms or the tsunamis.

“The world hurricane is the name given to natures strongest storm.
A hurricane occurs when high pressure and low pressure masses of air come in contact with one another.
There is often a significant difference in temperature between the two masses.
One mass is warm, while the other is cold.
The warmer air rises, and the cooler air falls.
Likewise, the low pressure area slides down the sides of the high pressure area.
They swirl in and around one another, creating the beginnings of the storm.”— AIR, “The virgin suicides ”, track 06 : The World hurricane, Astralwerks, 29 Feb 2000—
The “Machinic” part of the term reveals existing kind-of gears or machinery [a process in any case] that works inside many natural systems on a synergy. Is a kind of articulation that works and develops a novel state which is also expected to bring newer one if the present conditions are modified.
By the other hand the “Phylum” Calls the attention in the biological approach to life, this is the different lineages, families, or phylogenies in which the diverse living-beings evolved.
“The idea of a machinic phylum would then be that, beyond biological lineages, we are also related to non-living creatures (winds and flames, lava and rocks) through common “body-plans” involving similar self-organizing and combinatorial processes. As if one and the same material “phylum” could be “folded and stretched” to yield all the different structures that inhabit our universe.”— machinic phylum on the Web by De Landa—
…the journal Scientific American recently reported that a mathematical model, developed by Alvin Saperstein and later refined by Gottfried mayer-kress, “suggested that the same mathematics that described the transition of a jet of water from laminar to turbulent might be employed to describe the outbreak of war between nations…—De Landa M., “War in the Age of Intelligent Machines”.1999—
Nevertheless, the approach to the Machinic phylum of war systems, meaning: Weapons, Tactics, Strategy and logistics is the main subject of the book, hits was more used as pretext to explain with a very close example the way this combinatorial-richness of self-organization works in nature, going further biological explanations. The Machinic phylum which in fact is an emerge of order within the chaos, is also used to explain the way the computers from their very first beginning were a new “phylum” with their own evolving systems and how this technology at one point cross with the human-machinic-phylum in the form of interactivity. This is: …from the moment that the “mouse” appeared as an interface between the user and the computer, it may be said that the “machinic phylum” cross between humans and computers for the very first time. This cross is: interactivity, transforming the screen in the “information space” where humans can see correspondence between the movements of the “mouse” and the pointer displayed on the screen.
From this point onwards the novel man-machine-system has been developing different social-products in a shift towards a heterogeneous-union of this two “phylum”. The cell-phones are becoming little and with lots of functions that allow humans to communicate in different ways, also becoming a kind of ear-eye-speak-prosthesis. Is an everyday matter that most of the day-work is done by “remote-control”. By the other hand, the computer-processors are becoming smaller and powerful in order to let users deal with wider amount of information. The wireless connections are letting the transference of information without physical limits. And of course, the Internet, in its phase 2.0 permits the share and develops of knowledge in a self-organization system.
All this developments are the result of friction inside the man-machine-system, understanding friction as any condition where two or more, known or unknown components of a system converges in a state-of-flow, therefore is not an impact, neither a single approach. The reaction on each one of the components of this system is a loose and a gain on the same time —Nevertheless the friction can trigger a stop on the trajectory of components, this stop condition depends more on the previous behavior of the components than the friction per se.—
Nevertheless this two “phylum” are by now working on a novel system, it cannot be said that technology is going to give solutions to human problems. Because of the friction, there are many points in which the human side is going to loose some things. Paraphrasing De Landa… “Computer screens can become narcotic mirrors, trapping users by feeding them amplified images of their narcissistic selves. The same interface that can allow users to control the machine, can also give them a false and intoxicating sense of their own power… At every step we will find a similar mixture of new roads to explore and new dangers to avoid. And at all times we will have to play it by ear, since there is no way to predict in advance where those roads will lead, or what kinds of dangers they will present us with”